Some of the ‘Blind Test’ comparison pictures.
Click to ENLARGE.
Doesn’t matter which one is better. They are pretty close.
The DAMN Sony lens is 2.2 MORE EXPENSIVE.
I can pay 2.2 less and have the same image quality!
The test is in Japanese BUT, luckily, Google does an excellent job translating.
I did NOT have to do the whole test.
By the time I looked at 4 pictures I knew that my CONTENTION re. Sony was proved — BIG TIME.
My only gripe about Sony has been the prices of their lenses — especially full-frame, FE-mount lenses. They are ridiculously expensive. Yes, I could afford them BUT I would have a hard time justifying their prices. That is the reason I want to go with Nikon.
Until now, I couldn’t because Nikon didn’t make mirrorless, and I committed myself to mirrorless over 3-years ago.
The Nikon z6 is thus the ideal camera for I. Full-frame mirrorless, 5-axis In-Body Image Stabilization and affordable lenses (though I am not that convinced that the new lenses are superlative).
So, here is the CRUX of the Blind Test.
By definition, a Blind Test, compares similar offerings.
So, the image quality Nikon vs Sony was going to be CLOSE. And it is.
But, here is the kicker. The lens on the Sony is 2.2 MORE EXPENSIVE than that of the Nikon.
2.2 MORE Expensive and you can’t tell the DIFFERENCE.
Give me a break. I will have the CHEAP Nikon PLEASE.
The list of lenses were helpful. That is the main reason I am sharing so you too can have that list.
I happened to see this review (on Google News) from “Digital Camera World”. The two pictures they included — both above — impressed me NONE. They are SOFT. Reminded me of that damning photo taken with the new Canon EOS R.
I think I know what is wrong with the top picture. Aperture TOO WIDE. I would NOT have shot that at under f/11. More likely f/22 and I would have cranked the ISO upto 800, if not 1000.
So, it isn’t as if I don’t take pictures each and every day … and, moreover, post at least 7 a day on this blog. So, you can check out my pictures — which are ALWAYS UNTOUCHED JPEGs, straight-out-of-the-camera.
Yes, in my hands this lens would have fared much better.
So, two of my pictures, with my Sony a7 II …
Click pictures to ENLARGE.
Attribution WILL be enforced.
Note that daylight is NOT exactly 12 hours!
If anything we get closer to 12 hours 3 days later.
There is a reason for that. It is our latitude above the equator.
If we were closer to the equator it would have been closer to 12 hours.
See this explanation in Time-and-Date.
My equinox diagram.
Yes, they are an Indian outfit, out of India, that is v. good at scouring the Web for camera rumors but with limited technical understanding and a grasp of English not that dissimilar to Donald Trump. (That they have ‘a entry’ illustrates the latter, to a ‘T’.)
Yes, the Canon EOS R, lacking In-Body Image Stabilization does come up short and I had already discounted it, in favor of the cheaper Nikon Z6, with IBIS, BUT this was amusing to see. Canon could not have been happy because this is a Website that gets a LOT of hits because they are good at giving you scoops.
Just thought I will share this with you in case you hadn’t seen it. It was from September 8, 2018 — 3-days ago.
So, this morning I went looking for it. Got it from the Nikon Website. But, you can download a copy directly from here. That way you can buy yourself a few seconds and dive straight in.
I need to study it further — but I will have plenty of time. I do NOT plan to get my Nikon Z6 till after Christmas. I want all the holiday craziness to be over and for Nikon to have got rid of its first batch. I can wait. The Sony a7 II is still doing good.
I will keep you posted.