Sri Lanka’s Supposed World’s Tallest Christmas Tree Looks Pretty Ugly — Yikes.
>> >> Previous post re. this tree. << <<
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83be6/83be6a77bc635111e9b91fcf9d057ee97f9ef8ee" alt="sri-lanka-christmas-tree-afp_650x400_81482579714 sri-lanka-christmas-tree-afp_650x400_81482579714"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14bd7/14bd7e6ad6ee9138751be56abe27aa12d7437fc4" alt="15726485_10207523260591241_8807806594616196874_n 15726485_10207523260591241_8807806594616196874_n"
Click to ENLARGE.
Unlit it does NOT look good. Awkward shape. Very phallic!
Now could it be that the Sri Lankan Buddhists who actually built it are TAKING THE MICKEY.
I am not sure what to think.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19113/19113d896d26d163111fb7d1428c83c1156229f5" alt="Mexico City's tree, at 110 meters -- looks quite decorative."
Mexico City’s tree, at 110 meters — looks quite decorative.
Sure does NOT look right. If anything it is an eyesore in what is a very scenic, seaside setting.
Maybe it has to come down. Soon …
The one in Mexico City, at 110 meters, was conical, and looked quite nice — even during the day.
Not sure what to say.
I just can’t see something as ugly as this lasting too long in 70% Buddhist Sri Lanka irrespective of who built it.
Related Posts:
++++ Search ‘Christmas tree‘ for at least 3 other posts >>>>
**** Check Category ‘Sri Lanka’ >>>>