‘On Becoming A God In Central Florida’ (2019) ShowTime Series — Funny, Engaging & Above All Educational.
But, their series & documentaries sure make up for that. Thanks to Roku I got a free preview of SHOWTIME & I have been binging on it as much as I can.
I started with ‘Billions‘. Loved it to begin with, but around the 30th episode it was just too, too much. There is only so much (of a good thing) that you can take.
Saw this. I was hooked by the title. I will watch anything that has ‘God’ in the title. Honest.
Wow. Very well produced.
Tremendous insights into pyramid marketing. WOW. I wish everybody involved in pyramid marketing will watch this series to see how they are being exploited. That was the educational part. Anybody thinking of joining a pyramid scheme should watch this series.
Funny & amusing too. Will have you in stitches. I definitely recommend it. You can see some of it on YouTube.
Pope Francis Dropping The ‘VICAR OF CHRIST’ Title — Canon Anthony Churchill, STL, From The U.K. Has This To Say.
Father Anthony Churchill, STL, of Sussex, U.K. is one of my closest collaborators when it comes to my papal work. Do a search on this blog for ‘Fr. Churchill’.
He, as the STL, denotes (see below) is extremely knowledgeable on theology. He has spent much time in Rome and has has concelebrated Mass with Paul VI in Rome and Pope Benedict XVI in London.
The Vicar of Christ
The interesting fact about this new layout of the Vatican Year Book is political rather than theological. Such a change could hardly have been made without the knowledge and approval of the Pope himself. It is at once strange and, to my mind, most inappropriate.
This kind of decision does not in any way alter Catholic theology.
In Catholic teaching the Bishop of Rome is in virtue of that office the successor of St Peter, and as such he is the visible sign and instrument of the unity of the Church worldwide.
Various titles have been acquired over the centuries, which reflect historical realities. Thus the Pope is considered as the Primate of Italy and Archbishop of the Roman Province. Neither title is essential to his office, but have developed over the centuries.
The most important titles are “Servant of the servants of God” invented by Pope St Gregory the Great in the sixth century. It describes what Pope ought to be.
The other is “Vicar of Christ”.
This expresses the Pope’s function as Peter’s successor. I believe that it came into use in the late Middle Ages. Before that it had been more common to speak of the Pope as “Vicar of Peter”. Either way these titles describe what the Pope is called to be and to do.
Whether or not we use these titles does not take away from what we see as the God given function of the Pope as Peter’s successor, all that goes with that.
That said, I think this is a most odd decision. It seems to elevate the importance of the particular individual who happens to be the Pope at any one time.
In my view these ancient titles are part of our Catholic tradition and reflect the historical development of the Papacy over the centuries.
This decision, whoever was responsible, was ill judged.
The Pope is not to impose his own will on the Church without regard to the Faith and practice handed down. He is called to “preside in love” over the whole Church and to serve the unity of the Church as shepherd and teacher.
I fear that the present Pope does not always act wisely in this regard.
I have always maintained that the Pope as ‘Vicar of Christ’
has moral responsibilities.
This is HUGE!
The implications are staggering.
And in the midst of the Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic?
Timing is extremely strange & suspect.
Basically the pope is saying: ‘I do NOT represent Christ/God on Earth. Do not hold me responsible. I am just the Bishop of Rome‘.
Cardinal Gerhard Müller points out that in the new presentations of the titles of the Pope, there are mixed together titles with dogmatic significance with those that do not bear such weight and who have a historical background (such as “Sovereign of the State of the Vatican City”).
German Cardinal Gerhard Müller supposedly called this an “embarrassment” & “a theological barbarism“. Wow.
Make up your own mind.
This is HUGE. Trust me on that.
The Timing? The Timing?
This is crazy.
I have said that he is the Donald Trump of Popes. SMILE.
But, maybe Donald Trump will try to buy this title from the Pope. It has to be worth Trillions.
Harry Most Likely Was Born On The Wrong Side Of The Blanket, He Should Never Have Been ‘His Royal Highness’ (HRH).
Click to ENLARGE.
Yes, yes, yes, I have heard all the denials BUT my eyes don’t deceive me. When I see Harry I see his mother’s (i.e., Princess Diana’s) acknowledged boyfriend, James Hewitt. Google it. I am not the only one who believes it. Look at the above pictures. Look at him next to William. Do they look ANYTHING like each other. Just the color of the hair. Exact same color as James Hewitt.
Yes, of course, it would be very awkward for the Royal Family to admit to this — i.e., that he is illegitimate. This would have been unthinkable when he was ‘The Spare’ — i.e., replacement if something happened to his older brother. Now it doesn’t matter anymore given that his brother, William, has children of his own. The line of succession goes through them. Hence, why Harry is no longer the spare. Instead he is number 6 inline. Hence why he was already a MINOR royal before all this uncalled for fuss in 2020.
So, that is my take. I have always, narry an exception, claimed he was not of royal blood. So, I for one am glad that he will no longer have a royal title. As we Brits say: GRBR.
He has been a good and valued friend for many years.
He and my adoptive father were roughly contemporaneous and firm friends though on many issues related to religion they were on opposite sides. But, that was the beauty and magic of WHAT WAS Ceylon in the 1950s and 1960s. Folks were still friends, relatives and neighbors irrespective of religion.
Father Gomis is a wonderful human being. And to I, that is all that matters. He is now 85-years old.
Over the last few years he has been using the ‘+’ in front of his name.
That is not a plus sign. It is meant to be a CROSS. It is meant to connote a title assumed by clergy in the medieval times — that of a SINNER. So, the ‘+’ indicates that the Archbishop is signing himself, out of HUMILITY, as a ‘sinner’.
++++ Search ‘Gomis’ for other posts >>>>
We were talking about Haile Selassie just 35-days ago, i.e., on July 23, 2017, since that was the anniversary of his birthdate.
Today, August 27th is the anniversary of his death, in 1975. He was 83-years old. There had been a military coup in 11-months earlier. Haile Selassie had been imprisoned. He died while in prison and some believe, to this day, that he was assassinated. So, today spare a thought for a man who went by the title: His Imperial Majesty the King of Kings of Ethiopia, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah, Elect of God.
++++ Check Categories ‘Think’ & ‘Events’ for other related posts >>>>
Dei Gratia Britanniarum Regnorumque Suorum Ceterorum Regina,
Consortionis Populorum Princeps, Fidei Defensor
Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second,
by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
So she has been Queen all my life.
As I have said before I was NOT always a Monarchist. But, she has WON me over. She is special. Not sure what we will do when she is gone — which, alas, is going to happen at some point. But, not thinking of that today.
Longest currently reigning monarch — and the ‘currently reigning’ is key.
At present only #42 in the list of longest reigning monarchs! #42. Wow. Record is 82! 82. Lot that reigned 70+ years. Impressive.
First and foremost there are two things wrong with the TITLE of this PBS special. The title for the pope is dead WRONG! He is “Saint Pope John Paul II” or “Pope Saint John Paul II“. It is important that ‘Pope’ is in the title along with Saint. Plus, and this is important, he is NOT, and I REPEAT, NOT “John Paul”. He is, was and will always be “John Paul II“. There is another Pope John Paul who will one day be a Saint. They actually got this pope’s name dead wrong too! When talking about his election in 1978, and then Cardinal Karol Jzef Wojtyla paying his homage to the new pope, they referred to the pope as “John Paul”. NO. He was NEVER, EVER “John Paul”. From the moment he accepted the papacy he was “John Paul I”. These are small but important things that PBS should have got right.
Then the title claims “secrets” — in plural. But from what I can see this program is all about his relationship with Polish Anna Teresa Tymieniecka (who by the way had a Hanover, New Hampshire connection). The program tries to insinuate that it was a platonic relationship with no physical element. But there is no proof either way. Plus popes are notorious for their scandalous very intimate relationship with women, married women as well, over the millennia. So in the scheme of things this is not such a big deal.
What would have been more interesting is the oft stated belief that the Pope was a widow or a divorcee! He supposedly having been married, young, ahead of WW II.
So bit of a disappointing and tedious program. Just one SECRET and it is not that intriguing unless there is proof that she was actually his mistress in the accepted connotation of such relationships.
>> “Secrets of the Vatican” special.
++++ Search ‘pope’ for MANY other posts >>>>
++++ Check Category ‘religion’ >>>>
by Anura Guruge
Other Related posts:
>> Sri Lankans kissing balls.
>> Letter to London Times.
>> West Indies Women’s Team.
>> Dhammika Prasad v. Ishant Shrama.
>> Sri Lanka’s Christian cricket captain.
++++ Check Categories ‘Cricket’ & ‘Sri Lanka’ for many other related posts >>>>
Click the images to ENLARGE and read here.
Yes, I know that there is no reason, whatsoever, for me to feel sorry for Imran Khan, but I do. Yes, Imran had the world at his feet, and all the women he ever desired at his beck and call, all his adult life. He enjoyed a level of success in every sphere, and particularly with women, that strugglers like I can only gape at in amazement.
I have always liked Imran, 11 months my senior — despite the few controversies, in and out of cricket, that he got embroiled in. He was one heck of a cricketer. Always exciting whether batting, bowling or fielding. He was a giant. I have seen him in person a few times when we were both in England at the same time. Once, famously, I saw him in the car park of the Hampshire Cricket Club, Southampton Grounds, canoodling with a young lady. I did say “Hi, Imran” as I walked past. It would have been rude not to acknowledge him.
Other than all the pleasure he has given me as an outstanding cricketer, there are two things in my life that relate directly to him in one way or another.
1/ The title of my first, and financially my most successful book, “SNA: Theory and Practice“, in 1984, was conjured by a rather brilliant young lady who was an ex-girlfriend of Imran’s during his time in Oxford. She was in charge of marketing for the publisher. I did not have a title for the book. But I explained to her what it was about and how I structured the book to first explain the architecture and then how the architecture was implemented. I was thinking along the lines of “SNA: Architecture and Implementation”. She came up with the much better title. Given that she knew that I was a cricket fanatic she would remind me, every time we met, that she knew Imran in the Biblical sense. Wish I could remember her name. So that is the first connection.
2/ Imran explained to me why I so often get accused of being arrogant. Since Imran cleared it up for me it no longer bothers me, not that it bothered me overly, at any time, arrogance a great body armour against slights such as that. I couldn’t help it and still can’t. Despite my best efforts I can come across as arrogant and I am. Imran, in his 1988 book, “All Round View“, explained to me why he and I are both arrogant — though he, obviously, has better reasons to be so, than I. In 1988 I was living in the U.S. but had bought the book in one of my many trips back home. I was reading it one night, in bed, when I came across this paragraph about how his parents had brought him up to be arrogant. It was an Eureka moment. I sat up in bed. I realized. My (adoptive) parents too had brought ME up to be arrogant. It was a part of how we were brought up. Cultural. We, the first generation of post-independence kids to aspiring upper middle class families, were expected to be arrogant. It all became clear. Since then I don’t give a jot when my wife accuses me of insufferable arrogance. What can I do? My (adoptive) parents brought me up to be so. If you don’t believe me, ask Imran.
Anyhow. I feel bad for Imran. This was unnecessary. But I doubt whether he has any shortage of women clamoring to provide him with sucor.
All the best Imran. You deserve the best. Cheers.
by Anura Guruge
>> Sling TV, DishWorld & Willow Cricket.
++++ Check Category ‘Cricket’ for many other related posts >>>>
The program guide titles are wrong!
Does NOT say “Zimbabwe“. That is a bummer.
Had to call Sling TV (in Toronto, Canada) to sort it out.
The T20 is at 9:30 am (EASTERN) on Friday, May 22, 2015. So the title is wrong, BUT the match is there.
Contact me or Sling TV if you are still having problems.