The 30′ ‘Great Wall Of Vaginas’ — Deanna Sent Me Link And Said: ‘Very, very odd, not sure what to think, but thought you’d have an opinion’
..by Anura Guruge
Well, of course, I have an opinion. I have an opinion on everything; I even have my own private opinions on my own opinions.
The theme does not shock me in the least. I remember that ‘Sex in the City‘ (in the days that I used to watch in long, long, long time ago) had an episode about an artist that painted vaginas — no, no, not the vagina per se, but depictions of it on canvas. << See Below >> I also know, though I don’t have any first hand experience, that there is at least one place in Vegas where you can get a latex mould, which could be made functional, made while you wait. I also think that of late the moulds are gender independent.
So, what do I think of this Great Wall. Bravo. Why didn’t I think of it?
After saying that, at least in the 40 shown in the ‘Huffington Post’ image 1 (above), there are few, if any, that I would class as being truly delectable. Some of them are truly gross! Sorry. Not sure about the 3rd one on the top row — where I assume that all of those can’t be studs and what is below is definitely not artificial. I am sure that IF I ever had had the misfortune to encounter that, I would have fled and kept on running until I found a vat of acid in which to purify myself. Some show what looks like heavy use, while other point to a proclivity for undue manipulation. The vaginal ring does, indeed, intrigue me, though I would be worried that it could get ripped, which would be quite painful, I would think.
So, bottom line here; they can keep these. None of these are really my cup of tea. But enjoy.
I wonder whether the artist, Jamie McCartney, bothered to question each woman and kind of create a log for each. I would have a set of specific questions for all. Then we could correlate certain things with visible characteristics. Hhhhmmmm. Got me thinking. Maybe doing a study of vagina shapes and characteristics and trying to correlate them to proclivities and other behaviors might be more fun than papal history. I know that Deanna won’t object as long as I start with her.
So … maybe … watch this SPACE >>>>
P.S., You think Gloria Huffington is featured on this wall, and that is why they did this post? If so which one? My guess, judging by per prissy personality, #2 second row? Do you think I am right? Can’t be that much of a secret?
Anthem, At Least In Ct., Extends ‘First Month’ Premium Payment Window To January 15, 2014. Print ‘Temporary ID Card’ Still Kaput.
by Anura Guruge
>> Thanks to N.H. Insurance Dept.
>> I get Membership # — Jan. 6, 2014.
>> I report Anthem to Attorney General
>> — Jan. 4, 2014.
>> Anthem lies about payment
>> — Jan. 3, 2014.
>> Finally enrolled — Dec. 27, 2013.
++++ Search ‘Anthem’ for my new woes with damn ‘Anthem’ >>>>
Not sure whether this also applies to N.H.
I would think, maybe even hope, so … but from what I am seeing and hearing extending the window is NOT the issue.
The issue is with folks who, like I, have already paid BUT have yet to be processed — though in my case, luckily, I have a Member ID.
I checked again this morning, a few minutes ago,
to see whether the ‘Print Temporary ID Card’
functionality has been activated.
So, what is the story here with Anthem?
Is it incompetence or is it much more Machiavellian than that?
Unlike healtcare.gov these folks are supposedly a corporate, for PROFIT, entity who have been in this racket for a very long time. I remember having this very same HMO Plan, the ‘Matthew Thorton’, in 1987 when I worked for Wang!
I find it incomprehensible that they can be this inept.
I think that they are trying to undermine Obamacare.
I don’t know who is in charge of Anthem. But, whoever its, should be fired and as is the wont in corporate America be given a MASSIVE multi-million dollar bonus for their stupidity.
Now I need to go. Need some new tires.